A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted national consideration following an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier plus the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, search for to construct their loved ones household. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where by advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying built by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are matter to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, particularly inside a sensitive coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, that is partly created, is in the correct position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever views of The ocean are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In line with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, an image that has given that grow to be emblematic from the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they have been meant to gather visual evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the h2o in the course of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned The most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately from the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment from the authorized timeline.
On the Main with the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his examination of setting up documents, maps, and problems hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private look at, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair simply wanting to build a relatives property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Specific Location of Conservation and say that every one functions happen to be performed determined by Skilled advice and approved options. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not change the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around design of wall at coastal web René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times page happens to be a shorthand description for just a scenario that a lot of observers see as significantly common. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier observed which the businessman had Earlier been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite various Expert backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of waist-high h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of all-natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of the dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. Regardless of whether it'll finally be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely carry on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.